- def.h: changed vectors for inorganics to contain uint8_t instead of bool which improves the performance when using std::fill and std::memset to batch-set the whole array
- survey.cpp: using std::memset instead of direct assignment to reset the inorganic vectors, also using the actual size of each vector for the call
- changelog.txt: add note concerning the changes
- make depth and name parameters optional
- allow depth to be negative to indicate top-down instead of the
previous hard-coded bottom-up
- add --cursor for specifying start position (game cursor is not needed
if this param is specified)
remove the unneeded cache layer. the cache is for writing. we're just
reading. all the cache is doing is adding latency as it makes its copies
of map data structures.
generating a 190x190x100 dig blueprint:
before change: 1.7s
after change: 1.0s
the performance gains aren't as important here as the reduced complexity
of the algorithm, though. for reasonably-sized blueprints, the time
savings are unnoticeable.
To reproduce:
1. Enter the `d`esignation menu
2. Press `-+` to change priorities
3. Create a designation
4. Press `Alt-p` to hide priorities
5. Exit and re-enter the designation menu (`Esc`, `d`)
Previously, priorities would be visible again after step 5. With this change, they are not visible until you press `Alt-p` again.
Fixes#1068. Note that this is a relatively unobtrusive fix: selecting a priority with `+-` will still result in priorities being shown again. This is native DF behavior that I am reluctant to override because users of designation priorities likely want to see them.
- Use at() to crash immediately on out-of-range errors instead of introducing
memory corruption (see #1824)
- Replace custom implementation of df::unit::find()
- Use range-based for with get_vector() where appropriate
Planning a 4x2 construction with DF's `umkh` keys (i.e. not automaterial's box-select) would previously produce a 5x3 construction instead, for example.
Fixes#1803
Running a command that created a new screen would previously result in a screen
order that looked like this, due to how `Screen::Hide` works:
- DF screen
- `command-prompt` screen (dismissed)
- New screen
The `command-prompt` screen remained on the stack until the new screen was
dismissed, so it would intercept viewscreen vmethod calls intended for the
DF screen.
This change adds a new behavior to `Screen::Hide` that results in this screen
order after running a command:
- DF screen
- New screen
- `command-prompt` screen (dismissed) - DF removes this screen immediately
lethosor
myk002
bseiller
Ben Lubar